How a Corruption–Import Model, Faith-Linked Activism, and Foreign NGOs Delayed Self-Reliance—and Why Vigilance Is Critical Today
Summary
- For decades until 2014, Bharat’s development was constrained by a governance model that thrived on corruption, import dependence, and policy paralysis.
- Faith-linked activism and foreign-funded NGOs were pampered and protected, serving as vote-bank mobilisers, intermediaries, and shields for illegal mafias—while regulated manufacturing, mining, dams, and infrastructure were stalled in the name of environmental, tribal, and humanitarian concerns.
- After 2014, a nationalist policy shift prioritised Make in India, technology, transparency, and self-reliance, threatening entrenched interests.
- In response, the same ecosystem adapted—deploying litigation, protests, and international pressure to slow projects.
- The challenge now is to protect legitimate rights without allowing weaponised activism to derail national progress.
1. Development Obstructed by Design
Since Independence, Bharat’s growth has faced hurdles beyond capital and capacity. A less examined barrier has been organised obstruction—where noble causes were used to paralyse strategic projects. Over time, a pattern emerged:
- Industrial, mining, water, and infrastructure projects repeatedly stalled
- Faith-linked networks and foreign NGOs amplified resistance
- Local disputes internationalised to apply external pressure
- Long-term national interest subordinated to ideological narratives
The outcome was not balance, but delay, dependence, and deprivation—especially for resource-rich yet poor regions.
2. Pre-2014 Governance: Exploitation, Loot, and Import Dependence
Until 2014, governance was shaped by incentives that rewarded stagnation:
- Exploitation of the poor through weak service delivery and patronage
- Large-scale corruption and scams embedded in opaque systems
Preference for imports over domestic manufacturing, because imports:
- Enabled kickbacks and commissions
- Kept supply chains opaque
- Sustained rent-seeking networks
Little interest in building manufacturing or technology capacity, which would have reduced discretion and increased transparency
- In this model, strong domestic industry and regulated mining were inconvenient—they threatened corruption pipelines.
3. Pampered Activism: Faith Networks and Foreign NGOs as Political Instruments
Faith-linked organisations and foreign NGOs were protected and legitimised because they served multiple purposes:
A. Vote-Bank Mobilisation
- Mass influence in tribal and vulnerable belts
- Identity-based consolidation during elections
- Political mediation presented as social service
B. Informal Power Brokerage
- Acting as backchannels and intermediaries
- Facilitating influence around import and defence deals
- Providing plausible deniability to decision-makers
C. Shielding Illegal Mafias
- Legal projects stalled, while illegal mining continued
- Conversion networks expanded with minimal scrutiny
- Selective enforcement of environmental laws
Ironically, regulated development was opposed, while illegality thrived.
4. Project Case Studies: How the Template Played Out
POSCO, Odisha
- One of the largest proposed FDIs in steel
- Faith-linked leaders joined protests; access blocked
- Manufacturing framed as injustice
Result: Investment lost, jobs denied, import dependence unchanged
Niyamgiri Hills
- Church-backed NGOs mobilised global pressure
- Vedanta’s refinery shut despite vast bauxite reserves
Result: No alternative livelihoods, continued poverty, illegal activity persisted
Sardar Sarovar Dam
- Decades of agitation and litigation
- World Bank funding withdrawn in 1993
Result: Water security delayed for millions; benefits realised decades late
Across cases, the pattern was consistent:
- Development portrayed as exploitation; stagnation sold as justice.
5. The Hidden Cost: Who Really Paid?
The burden of obstruction never fell on activists. It fell on:
- Tribal youth denied jobs
- Farmers waiting decades for irrigation
- States losing revenue and infrastructure
- The nation, forced into imports despite abundant resources
Economic stagnation was normalised as moral victory.
6. Post-2014 Course Correction: Nationalist Priorities and Self-Reliance
The leadership change in 2014 marked a structural break:
- Make in India as a national mission
- Focus on manufacturing, technology, and innovation
- Reducing import dependence for minerals, metals, defence, energy
- Transparent, regulated mining and infrastructure
- Tightened foreign funding norms and compliance
This shift directly threatened:
- Corruption networks and import lobbies
- Illegal mining and conversion mafias
- NGOs dependent on regulatory ambiguity
As self-reliance advanced, survival became harder for the old ecosystem.
7. The New Playbook: Old Networks, New Masks
Unable to operate as before, resistance rebranded:
- Litigation-first obstruction
- Environmental clearance challenges
- International advocacy and media pressure
- Humanitarian framing to delay execution
Objective: Slow Bharat’s economic growth and protect defeated interests.
8. Why Vigilance Is Essential Now
If obstruction succeeds:
- Jobs, water, energy, and infrastructure are delayed
- Import dependence returns
- Strategic autonomy weakens
Therefore, Bharat must ensure:
- Rights with development, not against it
- Full transparency and accountability for NGOs
- No foreign funding dictating national priorities
- Projects regulated, not paralysed
- Mafias never shielded by moral rhetoric
9. Protecting the Nation’s Right to Develop
- Environmental protection and tribal welfare are vital—but weaponised activism is not justice.
- Till 2014, stagnation enriched vested interests. After 2014, self-reliance threatens them—hence the resistance.
Bharat must guard its development journey with clarity and courage:
- Address concerns honestly
- Reject obstruction by design
- Advance jobs, water, energy, and industry
Protecting development is protecting sovereignty.
🇮🇳Jai Bharat, Vandematram 🇮🇳
Read our previous blogs 👉 Click here
Join us on Arattai 👉 Click here
👉Join Our Channels 👈
