Civilizational Integrity, Cultural Rights & The Targeting of Justice Swaminathan
1️⃣ Introduction: Why this matter is shameful?
India is witnessing something unprecedented:
- a High Court judge is being threatened with impeachment
- not for corruption, not for incapacity, not for misconduct
- but for decision acknowledging a lamp — the symbol of knowledge & civilizational identity
This is not a debate about ritual. This is a deeper battle over what India is allowed to remember of itself.
2️⃣ The Judgment & The Misinterpretation
Justice Swaminathan affirmed:
- Deepam (lamp) is a civilizational marker
- It predates religious divisions
- It symbolizes light, clarity, truth, knowledge
- It is not imposition or conversion, but cultural continuity
He did not:
- force ritual participation
- impose Hindu theology
- undermine any other religious practice
Yet the response has been:
- impeachment demands
- political mobilization
- selective outrage
- ideological escalation
3️⃣ Selective Secularism: When Culture is Allowed for Some & Punished for Others
Sabarimala Example:
A centuries-old custom was overturned by Supreme Court.
- No judge was impeached.
- No political campaign to remove the bench.
- Only legal review petitions.
Former CJI’s Mockery: Publicly mocked devotees: “Go and ask the deity.”
- No censure.
- No motion.
- No impeachment attempt.
Today’s Reality:
But when Justice Swaminathan upholds a harmless, universal ritual like lamp lighting, suddenly:
- outrage becomes justified,
- impeachment becomes urgent,
- judicial neutral acknowledgment becomes “bias.”
This double standard exposes politicized secularism.
4️⃣ What Is Actually Being Signaled to Judiciary?
The impeachment attempt sends a chilling message:
- “If you acknowledge Indian civilizational identity, you will be punished.”
Thus:
- judges may begin avoiding cultural references, even neutral ones
- temple rights may be adjudicated under ideological threat
- heritage interpretation may be silenced
>This is not constitutional balance.
>This is coercive secular conditioning.
5️⃣ Constitutionally Clear: Impeachment Is Not a Weapon
Impeachment grounds:
- proven misconduct
- incapacity
>Lighting a lamp ≠ misconduct
>Acknowledging culture ≠ incapacity
Thus the motion:
- violates constitutional spirit,
- undermines judicial dignity,
- sets a dangerous precedent.
If cultural acknowledgment becomes impeachable, then culture itself becomes prosecutable.
6️⃣ Cultural Identity Is Not Communal Identity
Deepam is:
- in Bharatanatyam
- in classical music sabhas
- in university convocations
- in government inaugurations
- in religious discourses
- in literature festivals
- in science awards
>It belongs to India, not one subset of India.
>Civilizational roots ≠ religious coercion.
7️⃣ Majority Cultural Rights Are Also Constitutional Rights
True secularism does not protect only minority symbols.
It protects:
- Christian sacraments,
- Muslim procession rights,
- Sikh turban identity,
- Buddhist chants,
and also
- Hindu rituals
- Hindu temple autonomy
- Hindu symbolism
One cannot be constitutionally upheld while the other is judicially punished.
8️⃣ Society’s Role: Calm, Civil, Constitutional
Support must be:
- assertive yet lawful
- clear yet dignified
- strong yet non-provocative
How society must respond:
- bar councils to defend judicial autonomy
- Dharma scholars to clarify civilizational symbols
- media literacy campaigns to counter distortion
- temple boards to engage legally, not emotionally
- intellectual forums to present constitutional clarity
9️⃣ CJI Intervention Is Necessary
The Chief Justice of India must intervene:
- to prevent impeachment misuse
- to protect judicial independence
- to safeguard judges from ideological harassment
- to assure the bench that culture is not punishable material
If the highest judicial office does not act now, a precedent of judicial silence under fear will take root.
🔟 Government Must Treat This as Civilizational Priority
This is not merely a Tamil Nadu state matter. It is a Bharat civilizational matter.
- Parliamentary dialogue is required
- Ministry of Culture must issue clarity on ritual neutrality
- Law Ministry should ensure impeachment is never politicized
- Temple autonomy needs national-level insulation
A nation whose philosophical bedrock is Sanatana Dharma cannot allow its civilizational symbols to be politically penalized.
Sanatana Dharma Rakshana Board: A Cultural Safeguard
To protect temples, rituals & customs from politicized interference:
- autonomous temple governance
- ritual decisions by Acharyas, not political officers
- cultural interpretation by scholars, not vote banks
- judicial respect for civilizational continuity
This is not dominance — it is cultural equity.
This Is Not About One Judge
Justice Swaminathan is a case study, not the case itself.
This moment will determine:
- whether India’s judiciary can acknowledge India
- whether culture must apologize to politics
- whether heritage can be mentioned without impeachment
To stand with him is to stand for balance, dignity, continuity.
- Not against any faith — but for fairness to all, including the majority.
🇮🇳 Jai Bharat, Vandematram 🇮🇳
For old Blogs please visit our website www.saveindia108.in
To join our whatsapp Community please click
https://chat.whatsapp.com/FMr2WNIgrUVG9xK78FW5Dl?mode=r_t
To join our Telegram group please Click https://t.me/+T2nsHyG7NA83Yzdl Old Blogs are available on the telegram group also.
