Judiciary’s Double Standards – Justice for Whom?

India’s judiciary is often described as the “last hope of justice.” But when we study its recent actions, we find an alarming pattern of selective priority:

👉 For Hindus and nationalists: delays, decades of pendency, excuses.
👉 For terrorists, infiltrators, NGOs, and radicals: urgency, midnight hearings, immediate relief.

This is not coincidence. It is a consistent judicial ecosystem that has eroded faith among millions of ordinary Indians.

📊 Pendency and Delay – Justice Denied for Common Indians

According to the Supreme Court’s own data, over 80,000 cases are pending in SC and 5+ crore cases in the judiciary overall.
Average life of a case? 10–15 years for ordinary litigants.
Property disputes, murders, rapes, Hindu temple cases – all drag on for decades.

Yet when it comes to:

a terrorist’s mercy plea,
an NGO challenging a policy,
or a politically sensitive case…

👉 suddenly courts move at breakneck speed.

🕉️ Kashmiri Pandits – 35 Years, No Justice

The 1990 exodus and genocide of Kashmiri Pandits should have been the Nuremberg Trial of India.
But instead of fast-track prosecution:

FIRs remained weak.
Cases kept being transferred and adjourned.

No “midnight urgency” was ever shown.

Contrast this with the Nirbhaya rape case (2012) – where nationwide protests forced the judiciary to act faster (still took 7 years).
For Kashmiri Pandits, there was no such urgency – because “liberal-secular” lobbies kept the issue buried.

🐕 Street Dogs Case – A National Mockery

Recently, foreign-funded animal rights NGOs challenged a Supreme Court ruling on stray dogs. Within 10 days, hearings were fast-tracked.

Think about it:

Dogs → 10 days
Kashmiri Pandits → 35 years

This is not compassion. This is a warped priority system, where NGOs and global lobbies dictate what gets heard quickly – while real citizens bleed in silence.

🚨 Other Examples of Judicial Bias

1. Yakub Memon (Mumbai Blasts, 1993)

Courts opened at midnight to hear his final plea.
International media amplified the case as a “humanitarian” matter.

Did any Kashmiri Pandit family ever get a hearing at midnight? Never.

2. Afzal Guru (2001 Parliament Attack)

Case dragged for years under the shield of “fair trial.”
Human rights activists campaigned relentlessly for him.

The same activists stayed silent on Hindu genocide in Kashmir.

3. Shaheen Bagh (CAA Protests)

Citizens stuck for months. Businesses destroyed. Students, office-goers harassed.
Instead of quick eviction orders, SC called it a “right to protest.”

Common man suffered, but “NGO-backed protesters” were given cover.

4. Rohingya Deportation Cases

The moment government tried to deport illegal Rohingyas, SC jumped in.
Multiple hearings, human rights concerns.

But victims of illegal migration – locals losing jobs, women facing harassment – got no voice in court.

5. Hindu Temples and Sites

Ram Janmabhoomi dragged for 134 years.
Gyanvapi endlessly adjourned.
Mathura Krishna Janmabhoomi stuck in “status quo” orders.

Meanwhile, mosque/church-related cases often receive urgent listing.

“Doesn’t all this point towards an anti-national and anti-Sanatan mindset?” ✅

❓ The Double Standard in One Line

For Hindus and nationalists: Justice Delayed = Justice Denied.
For terrorists, infiltrators, NGOs: Justice Express = Justice Abused.

🧩 Why This Bias?

NGO & Foreign Lobby Pressure – Many PILs are filed by well-funded organizations that lobby for speed.
Leftist Legal Ecosystem – A large section of senior advocates and activist-lawyers belong to a “liberal-secular” cabal that prioritizes anti-national causes.
Judicial Activism in Selective Causes – Courts often overstep in policy areas (like environment, NGOs, minorities) but stay “silent” in Hindu or nationalist issues.
Global Narrative Shaping – Quick judgments for minorities/terrorists are highlighted globally to project India as “tolerant,” while Hindu causes are suppressed.

⚠️ The Danger Ahead

Unproven voter fraud narratives, selective NGO-driven cases, and judicial delays in Hindu issues are not just about justice. They’re about:

Destroying faith in institutions
Creating unrest among majority citizens
Opening doors for foreign intervention

If the judiciary continues this double game, Bharat’s democracy will rot from within.

The judiciary must decide:

Is it the guardian of Bharat’s common man, taxpayers, and patriots?
Or the umbrella for terrorists, infiltrators, and anti-national NGOs?

When dogs get justice in 10 days, but Kashmiri Pandits wait 35 years,

It is not justice. It is betrayal.

If this imbalance isn’t corrected, the judiciary will no longer be remembered as the “temple of justice,” but as the fortress of injustice – protecting enemies, while ignoring its own people.

🇮🇳 Jai Bharat, Vandematram 🇮🇳

For old Blogs please visit our website www.saveindia108.in