Why is Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind rattled by “Udaipur Files”?

Are Islamic fundamentalists afraid of the truth finally coming out?

When tailor Kanhaiya Lal was brutally beheaded on camera in Udaipur, where were Maulana Arshad Madani and Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind?
What kind of “brotherhood” was behind such a barbaric act?
Wasn’t that incident a direct assault on Indian democracy, the rule of law, and Hindu society?

Now that “Udaipur Files” is bringing that horrifying truth to the screen, why is Jamiat so disturbed?

🔥 “The film spreads hatred…” — or does it show an uncomfortable mirror?

Jamiat’s petition claims:

“The film is divisive… incites communal tension… misuses freedom of expression… portrays Muslims in a negative light and violates their right to live with dignity.”

So here are some honest questions:

When Kanhaiya Lal was butchered in broad daylight, was that promoting peace?
When mobs chanted “Sar Tan Se Juda” (behead the blasphemer), was that an expression of harmony?

Why do people like Maulana Madani go completely silent when Hindus are attacked or insulted?

📽️ “Udaipur Files” — Not just a movie, but a national wake-up call

This film is not fiction. It’s a painful documentation of a real, recorded act of Islamist violence.
It isn’t anti-Muslim. It’s anti-terror, anti-jihad, and a reminder of how vulnerable our society has become.
Just like “The Kashmir Files”, this film too exposes the dangerous silence and double standards of those who claim to defend “secularism.”

❗ Brotherhood or Just a Convenient Cover for Violence?

Was it “brotherhood” when:

Hindus were slaughtered by name in Pahalgam?
Shivling in Gyanvapi was used for ritual washing for centuries?
Stones were pelted during Hindu processions on every festival?
Taslima Rahmani insulted Lord Shiva on live TV?
Chhangur Baba maintained a “conversion rate card” for Hindu girls?
Hakim Salauddin was caught running a massive illegal arms factory?

If this is your idea of “brotherhood,” then it’s time the nation redefined what unity actually means.

⚖️ Do Hindus not have the right to speak the truth?

If Maulana Madani has the right to live with dignity,
then Hindus too have the right to seek justice, defend their culture, and speak out against religious violence.
“Udaipur Files” doesn’t promote hate.
It exposes a harsh truth — and truth hurts only the guilty.

🔱 This is not just a film — it’s a warning

This film reminds us that silence isn’t strength, awareness is.
It teaches us that forgetting history invites repeat atrocities.
It empowers a peaceful, tolerant Hindu society to defend itself from those who seek to break it.

⚖️ The Controversy: Legal Challenge and Court Stay

The Islamic organization Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind filed a petition stating that the movie could inflame communal tensions. Senior advocate and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal represented the petitioner, arguing that the film might disturb the fragile social fabric.
The Delhi High Court, as a precaution, temporarily stayed the release until a further hearing. This has triggered a backlash from sections of society who see this as a curb on freedom of expression and an attempt to silence uncomfortable truths.

🧭 The Broader Debate: Truth vs Peace — Must They Clash?

This situation underscores a critical dilemma:

Should hard truths be withheld if they risk disturbing peace?
Or should society face such truths head-on, using them to initiate reforms and build resilience?

🧾 Truth Must Be Told, But Responsibly

India is the world’s largest democracy, and freedom of speech is sacred—but so is social peace. The ‘Udaipur Files’ case is not just about a film—it’s about how a nation processes trauma, justice, and truth.
Kanhaiya Lal’s murder was not just a crime, but a wake-up call to stand united against radicalization, regardless of religion. Let’s demand justice, embrace truth, but with maturity, unity, and constitutional grace.

If someone is disturbed by “Udaipur Files”,
then they are either the perpetrator, or a protector of perpetrators.