Vultures of Justice: Supreme Court for Terrorists Only?

Is justice still blind, or has it chosen a side? The rising perception of a “Supreme Court for Terrorists Only?” raises serious questions about fairness, bias, and the true guardians of the Constitution.

Have you ever wondered…

When it’s about saving terrorists from hanging,
When members of the “Tukde Tukde Gang” are in jail,
When anti-nationals shout “Bharat tere tukde honge” (India will be broken into pieces) in open courts,

The Supreme Court of India opens its doors at 2:00 AM.

But when:

There’s a plea to free Hindu temples from state control,
A case is filed demanding a Uniform Civil Code,
Matters related to Hindu rights or national interest are raised,

The cases drag on for years without resolution.

Have you ever wondered…

When it’s about saving terrorists from hanging,
When members of the “Tukde Tukde Gang” are in jail,
When anti-nationals shout “Bharat tere tukde honge” (India will be broken into pieces) in open courts,

The Supreme Court of India opens its doors at 2:00 AM.

But when:

There’s a plea to free Hindu temples from state control,
A case is filed demanding a Uniform Civil Code,
Matters related to Hindu rights or national interest are raised,

The cases drag on for years without resolution.

Examples of Rapid Hearings (for Anti-Nationals):

Afzal Guru Case (2006–2013):

Mastermind of the 2001 Indian Parliament attack.
His execution was challenged at odd hours, and the Supreme Court opened late at night for an emergency hearing.
Justice seemed influenced by emotional pressure rather than national interest.

Yakub Memon Execution (2015):

Accused in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts.
Supreme Court opened at 3 AM to hear a last-minute plea to save him from the gallows.
What message does this send? That terrorists get urgency but national interest doesn’t?

Umar Khalid & Sharjeel Imam – “Tukde-Tukde” Gang:

Accused of inflammatory speeches during anti-CAA protests leading to Delhi riots.

Their bail pleas get speedy attention. The media portrays them as victims, and courts show leniency.

On the Other Hand – Hindu & National Interest Cases Pending for Years:

Kashi Vishwanath – Gyanvapi Case:

The historical evidence of temple demolition is overwhelming.
Yet, the matter keeps getting delayed, with the court repeating “status quo.”

Uniform Civil Code (UCC):

Promised in the Constitution under Article 44.
Yet the courts always pass the buck, saying “it’s a matter for Parliament.”
No urgency, no hearing.

Hindu Temples Under Government Control:

Thousands of temples in Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka are under state control.
Despite PILs and legal challenges, the courts avoid taking a firm stand.

But when it comes to mosques or churches, the courts act swiftly.

📢 Why This Double Standard?

Is the Supreme Court only there to protect anti-nationals and their “rights”?
Should Hindus die waiting for justice?
Does Indian culture, faith, and heritage hold no value in its own land?

✅ What Needs to Be Done?

Judicial accountability must be enforced.

Fast-track hearings for national and Hindu interest cases.
Mass public pressure and movements to demand fairness.
Systemic reforms within the judiciary for transparency and priority setting.

This is not just a legal battle —