Summary:
- This narrative unmasks a long-term conspiracy woven against India’s cultural heritage and national security.
- It details how the mask of “development” was used to attempt the destruction of the sacred Ram Setu, how government machinery was misused to deny the existence of Lord Ram, and how the strategic interests of enemy nations like China were hidden behind these moves.
- Furthermore, it exposes the ideological hypocrisy of those who today oppose the expansion of India’s military capabilities (the Nicobar Project).
- This narrative clarifies that anti-Sanatana forces and anti-national elements are two sides of the same coin.
An investigation of strategic and cultural disputes from Ram Setu to Nicobar
I. The Attack on Ram Setu: A Plot to Erase Faith and History
The ‘Sethusamudram Project’ initiated in the mid-2000s was not merely an engineering project; it was the largest administrative assault on Sanatana culture in the history of independent India.
- The Insult to Lord Ram: The then UPA government filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court claiming that Lord Shri Ram is a fictional character. This was not just a legal document; it was a cruel blow to the faith of billions of Hindus.
- Denial of History: The affidavit stated that events like the Ramayana and Mahabharata never occurred and that the war between Ram and Ravana was merely a literary imagination. The goal was to turn India’s ‘history’ into ‘myth’ and sever Hindus from their roots.
- The Obsession to Destroy Ram Setu: Ignoring the arguments of scientists and archaeologists, the government was bent on breaking the ancient bridge, which had been identified as a man-made structure even in NASA satellite imagery.
II. The Illusion of Economic Gain and China’s Strategic Interest
The economic arguments presented for destroying Ram Setu were actually part of a larger geopolitical game, the direct benefit of which was intended for India’s enemies.
- A Smooth Route for China: Currently, ships must circumnavigate the entirety of Sri Lanka to pass through the Indian Ocean. If a path were cut through Ram Setu, it would have become a ‘shortcut’ for China’s massive cargo vessels.
- China’s ‘String of Pearls’ Policy: China is building ports in Sri Lanka (Hambantota) and Pakistan (Gwadar) to encircle India. A route through Ram Setu would have facilitated deeper Chinese intrusion within Indian maritime boundaries.
- Development at Foreign Behest: It was highly suspicious why the then-government was so impatient for a project that jeopardized India’s security while serving China’s commercial interests.
III. Ram Setu: India’s Natural and Scientific Defense Mechanism
Those who viewed Ram Setu as merely a pile of stones completely overlooked its scientific utility and environmental significance.
- Protection from Storms and Tsunami: Ram Setu acts as a ‘natural shock absorber’ to reduce the velocity of cyclones and tsunami waves rising from the Indian Ocean. In the 2004 tsunami, this structure saved several coastal areas of South India from massive destruction.
- A Vast Ecosystem: Ram Setu is home to millions of marine organisms, specifically coral reefs. Rare marine species breed here. Breaking it meant the permanent end of a rich biological heritage.
- Protection of Mineral Wealth: The areas surrounding Ram Setu hold deposits of critical minerals like Thorium, which are essential for India’s nuclear energy program. Breaking the bridge risked these deposits being washed into the sea or falling under foreign control.
IV. Ideological Hypocrisy: The Sham of Development vs. Security
The same people who were in favor of breaking Ram Setu in the name of ‘development’ are today opposing India’s defense projects in Nicobar. This clarifies their double standards.
- Opposition to the Nicobar Project: The Indian government is currently constructing a strategic military base (Naval, Air & Army base) and a transshipment port in Great Nicobar. This project is essential to exploit China’s ‘Malacca Dilemma.’
- Part of the Chinese ‘Toolkit’: Today, these forces are feigning concern for the ‘environment’ and ‘tribals.’ Yet, at the time of Ram Setu—which is a natural barrier—they had no concern for the environment.
- Thwarting Military Power: A naval base in Nicobar means India can blockade China in the Indian Ocean. Opposing this is equivalent to providing direct strategic help to China.
V. Sanatana and Nation First: An Essential Consciousness
The issue of Ram Setu is not just one of faith, but of national pride and security. It is a war against forces that do not accept India as a ‘Civilization.’
- Judicial Intervention: Ultimately, the Supreme Court, recognizing religious sentiments and strategic importance, decided to save this heritage. This was a slap in the face for those calling ‘Ram’ fictional.
- Identifying Hypocrisy: The elements that wanted to destroy Ram Setu yesterday and are opposing the Nicobar base today have a single objective: to paralyze India culturally and strategically.
- The Vision of Hindu Rashtra: This narrative clarifies that India’s security is ensured only when its cultural heritage remains intact. The sentiment “Those who do not belong to Ram, are of no use to the Nation” must be awakened in every citizen today.
VI. Heritage is the Foundation of the Future
- Saving Ram Setu was not just a religious victory; it was a defense of India’s maritime borders and a defeat for foreign conspiracies.
- Today, as India emerges as a global power, we must remain wary of ‘internal enemies’ who hinder the construction of our defense infrastructure at China’s behest.
- Sanatana culture is the thread that binds India from Kanyakumari to Kashmir, and its protection is the protection of India’s very existence.
🇮🇳Jai Bharat, Vandematram 🇮🇳
Read our previous blogs 👉 Click here
Join us on Arattai 👉 Click here
👉Join Our Channels👈
