Reads & Views: 91

Dignity of Constitutional Institutions and Political Hypocrisy

Summary

This article presents a detailed analysis of the double standards of opposition parties, especially the Congress party, and the continuous attacks on constitutional institutions in contemporary Indian politics.
It highlights how leaders who claim to champion women’s dignity and constitutional protection flout these very values through their own actions.
The article also points out how constitutional institutions and their heads are being personally targeted out of frustration over electoral defeats.
Along with this, citing past legal examples, it suggests how personal defamation lawsuits can be filed against falsehoods and propaganda to legally curb such tendencies.

An Exposé of the Politics of Opposition

1. Introduction: Political Hypocrisy and Double Standards

A strange paradox has been visible in Indian politics lately. On one hand, opposition parties bravely invoke the protection of the constitution, women’s dignity, and democratic values, while on the other hand, their actual conduct appears completely contrary to all these claims.
This ideological and moral decline is proof that politics is no longer a medium of public service, but has merely become a tool to attain power and save individual political existence.
When political parties lose their ideological and grassroots battles, they choose the easy path of putting institutions in the dock.
This trend not only questions the maturity of Indian democracy but also affects the country’s reputation.

2. Hollow Claims of Women’s Dignity and Reality

Big claims about ‘women’s dignity’ are often made by the Congress party and its allies, but the ground reality exposes these claims:

Gap Between Conduct and Rhetoric: On one hand, speeches are given on public platforms for the protection of women’s rights and their respect, while on the other hand, the conduct of the party’s senior leaders and workers appears to be the exact opposite.
Limits of Misbehavior: It has been repeatedly observed in recent events how unseemly behavior is meted out toward women police personnel during protests or events. Whether it is the matter of touching women security personnel inappropriately or the action of a senior leader—who gives the slogan “Ladki Hoon, Lad Sakti Hoon” (I am a girl, I can fight)—pushing female officers with her elbow, all of this exposes their anti-women character.
Selective Empathy: For Congress, women’s dignity and safety are limited only to electoral slogans or publicity stunts. As soon as the elections end, this mask slips off, revealing their true character.

3. Political Selfishness and the Drama of Fasting

The fasts and protests staged recently against the Election Commission and constitutional functionaries were not for any public welfare, but were entirely driven by selfish political interests:

Desperation to Save Brand Value: The top leadership of Congress labored under the misconception that such dramatic fasts would boost the ‘brand value’ and PR of Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi. But reality turned out to be the exact opposite; these antics ruined whatever political credibility they had left.
Battle for Supremacy in the INDI Alliance: The primary objective of these so-called movements run by Rahul Gandhi is to establish himself as the undisputed leader of the entire opposition (INDI) alliance.
Electoral Bargaining: The main political agenda behind these dramas is to pressure regional parties (like the Samajwadi Party and Akhilesh Yadav) to extract maximum seats ahead of upcoming assembly elections in major states like Uttar Pradesh.

4. Insult to the Mandate and Electoral Reality

The frustration of losing elections is hidden behind the repeated raising of questions on ‘vote theft’ and EVMs or the election process by the opposition:

Public Disillusionment: The aware public of India has now rejected those who practice corruption and dynastic politics. The public has “stopped voting for thieves and corrupt individuals,” which the opposition cannot digest.
The Mirror of Tripura Local Body Elections: Recently in Tripura’s local body elections, despite voting being conducted via ballot paper, Congress was wiped out and the BJP won a massive majority. This makes it clear that the reason for defeat is not the process, but the public’s complete disillusionment with the opposition.
Contradiction of Regional Realities: If votes were actually stolen, how would opposition parties’ governments come into existence in Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, or other states? This is proof that constitutional institutions are working impartially.
The Real Reason for Distress: Constitutional institutions are now working with complete honesty and transparency. The problem is that fake voting, the protection of infiltrators, and the loot of the country’s wealth have now stopped, causing severe distress to anti-national and corrupt elements.

5. History of Defamation Lawsuits: Legal Curb on Rahul Gandhi’s Rhetoric

History bears witness that whenever legal nooses have been tightened against irresponsible statements and false propaganda, the people practicing this kind of politics have been silenced:

End of False Allegations against RSS: After defamation cases were filed by RSS worker Rajesh Kunte in the Bhiwandi court, Rahul Gandhi’s old rhetoric accusing the Sangh of Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination came to a halt.
“Commander-in-Chief” Remark: When BJP worker Mahesh Shrimal filed a defamation case over the unparliamentary remark made against Prime Minister Narendra Modi in 2018, the language of the statements changed.
“Modi Surname” Case: Following the conviction and legal process in the defamation suit filed by Purnesh Modi, has Rahul Gandhi ever been heard collectively insulting everyone with the Modi surname?
Abusive Words Against the Home Minister: After defamation cases were filed in the courts of Sultanpur and Jharkhand, the use of abusive vocabulary against Union Home Minister Amit Shah stopped.
Statements on Veer Savarkar and the Army: Due to judicial reprimand and the fear of lawsuits, derogatory words against Veer Savarkar and statements breaking the morale of the Indian Army have also been checked.

6. Legal Options for the Chief Election Commissioner and Officials

It is an established legal fact that the Election Commission as an institution cannot directly file a criminal defamation suit, but strong legal avenues are open to protect individual rights:

Right to Defamation in Individual Capacity: Officers, members, or constitutional functionaries of the commission who are specifically targeted as individuals by false propaganda, character assassination, and baseless allegations can file a criminal defamation suit in their individual capacity.
The Chief Election Commissioner Should Take the Initiative: Gyanesh Kumar, as a citizen and member of the commission, should file individual defamation cases against Rahul Gandhi and other concerned individuals over fabricated and false propaganda like ‘vote theft’ and ‘SIR’.
Moral Support of the Judiciary: Recently, an open letter was issued by 44 former judges of the country expressing support for the Election Commission and Gyanesh Kumar. This is proof that the enlightened class of the country stands with constitutional institutions.
Impact of the Lawsuit: If such a strict legal step is taken, those indulging in the politics of false allegations will have to make rounds of the courts, and this baseless rhetoric will be stopped forever.

Conclusion

Indian democracy is not the personal property of any individual or party; rather, it stands on the strong foundation of the constitution and impartial institutions.
The conspiracy of the opposition to defame institutions to save its political ground stands fully exposed before the public and the intellectual class of the country.
The time has come to counter this politics of lies and propaganda within the strict scope of the law so that the dignity and sanctity of the country’s democratic system remain intact.

🇮🇳Jai Bharat, Vandematram 🇮🇳

Read our previous blogs 👉 Click here